Last reviewed: 15 September 2026

Home › The Library › Nova Scotia vehicle warranty regulation

Nova Scotia: a dealer's own sales pitch can become part of your vehicle's warranty

Our Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan pages all cover provinces that regulate a purchased vehicle warranty as an insurance product, with a licensing regime to match. Nova Scotia doesn't take that approach at all — general consumer protection law, not an insurance statute, is what a Nova Scotia vehicle-warranty buyer actually deals with. That general law includes one specific, automobile-only provision most buyers never learn exists until they need it.

No insurance license required here

Where Alberta, BC, and Saskatchewan each require a vehicle warranty seller (or the insurer standing behind it) to hold a specific insurance licence, Nova Scotia has no equivalent dedicated licensing statute for this product. The primary consumer-facing law is Nova Scotia's own Consumer Protection Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 92 — a general statute, not an insurance-specific one — which is worth re-checking directly before assuming it stays this way, since a provincial classification like this can change the way Alberta's and Saskatchewan's own did in the years covered on our respective pages for those provinces.

Section 28A: when a sales pitch becomes an express warranty

The Act's section 28A does something narrower provinces' general sale-of-goods law generally doesn't spell out this directly for a specific product: it provides that a manufacturer, seller, or lessor makes an express warranty respecting an automobile where it makes a statement about that automobile — meaning a claim made in advertising, sales literature, or a dealer's own spoken pitch about the vehicle's condition, performance, or what's covered can itself be treated as a term of the deal, not dismissed afterward as mere sales talk. That's a materially different starting point than treating a salesperson's enthusiastic claim as background noise around a written contract that alone defines what you bought.

Section 28: and that protection can't be waived away

The same Act's section 28(1) closes the obvious workaround: any written term or acknowledgment that purports to negate or vary a condition or warranty under the Act, or to limit a seller's liability for breaching one — including a warranty section 28A itself creates — is void. A dealer can't undo what its own sales pitch created under section 28A simply by adding fine-print language disclaiming it; the statute treats that fine print as having no effect, the same non-waiver logic Ontario's Consumer Protection Act, 2002 applies more generally to Sale of Goods Act conditions (see our Sale of Goods Act page).

What this doesn't do

This isn't a Nova Scotia "lemon law" in the sense of a statutory buyback or repair-attempt-limit regime — the province has separately labelled certain written-off or manufacturer-buyback vehicles under its Motor Vehicle Act, a different, disclosure-focused law covering a different problem (whether a vehicle's damage history was disclosed, not what a seller said about its coverage). Section 28A also doesn't reach a claim CAMVAP itself already excludes from its own scope — a dispute over a third-party extended warranty or service contract rather than the vehicle manufacturer's own new-vehicle warranty remains outside CAMVAP's eligibility rules regardless of what a Nova Scotia seller said, as covered on our CAMVAP page.